|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2016, with Poona shaping as an idyillic beachside location and a more popular place to reside, our community came together to shape a 10 year town plan. Being a '10 Year Plan' - the community considered what Poona should look like in the 2030s. Below are some comparative images aimed to prompt thinking of how Poona shapes up against neighbouring communities. The top images are existing photos of Poona and second demostrating alternative appearances, more of the norm in other communities.
The formulated Town Plan was formally adopted by Fraser Coast Regional Council in 2020 and as we approach 2025 it's timely for the community to review what has been done; what hasen't been done, and why. The Poona community will again be invited to make contributions/comments etc ahead of likely open workshops. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poona Infrastructure Planning - The Process
The Poona Community Progress Association (PCPA), on behalf of the Poona community, has long advocated for better infrastructure in our town. Underpinning the desire is to make our town more liveable and ensure the town receives its share of services and amenities.
This page is designed as a medium to share facts and follows the evolution of concerted efforts on behalf of our wonderful community. Over many decades, all actions have had broad support of the majority of residents and since 2016 all actions undertaken have followed agreed actions established at open community workshops and actioned by the PCPA in accordance with those determinations.
As can be seen from the historic records, too much scuttlebutt and disinformation has been the cause of community uncertainty and immense community harm so be extremely mindful of actions inconsistent with majority community positions. Please, check any statements/opinions against the facts and be conscious
- to acknowledge democratically and balanced made decisions, and importantly
- maintain community solidarity as the key to success, as division ensures failure
For clarification of any aspects or general enquiries please contact the Infrastructure Planning Sub-Committee (IPSC) by email. |
Poona's Infrastructure Timeline
Below is a summary of actions in chronological order and incorporating links to supporting information and links to download key documents. |
1960s
In 1967, the original 640 acres of freehold land was sub-divided with a section on Outridge Avenue/Boronia Drive (29 lots) going to auction. The balance of the parcel of land was sold to the Poona Palms Pastoral Company.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to Top |
1970s
A channel was dredged in the 1970's (Owen Cox St) by the Poona Palms Pastoral Company for the specific purpose to load and unload cattle. The channel was quite a way out from high water mark. The spoil was used as fill in the caravan park with the park owned by the pastoral company.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
1980s
The dredged channel was accessed by local fisherman directly from the foreshore (no ramp). Through these early years the community strongly advocated for a proper boat ramp.
With continued lobbying, in the late 1980s a single boat ramp was constructed to join the existing dredged channel. The community was quite accepting of the facility, generally meeting the needs at the time but noting there were no designated trailer parking bays and the ramp facing the prevailing SE winds was a difficult ramp for launching and retrieving.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
1990s
In 1992, the developer (Peter Kurts) acquired from the Poona Palms Pastoral Company a 230ha site at Poona. The land had approval for 144 residential blocks. The Maryborough City Council (MCC) had strongly opposed any development in Poona but their decision is understood to have been overturned on court application.
Poona started to develop with nicely constructed housing blocks and the town started its growth.
In 1994, the first actions were taken on preservation of the Great Sandy Strait for environmental protection.
The boat ramp was becoming less usable due to the silting of the channel. The PCPA through the second half of the decade lobbied to get the channel dredged. See historic photos.
The MCC, with the financial backing of the developer (Peter Kurts) had applied for dredging of the channel and an upgrade of the ramp but that request was denied by Fisheries Department on environmental grounds. MCC lodged an Appeal to the Fisheries Tribunal and a public meeting was held at the boat ramp demonstrating the community's desire to have the channel dredged.
Issues arose in the community with a long-time resident opposing the dredging purportedly because it would only attract more boats to the area and take the fish. The resident, ignoring the community's desires organised a petition with 70 signatures against the proposal. MCC withdrew the Appeal and the project shut down.
In 1999, with environmental interests of the migratory shorebirds, a Ramsar Wetland Area in Great Sandy Strait was declared.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2000s
Early in this decade the new land developer sought to decrease the planned block sizes on the balance of the estate (higher density living). The community strongly objected on environmental grounds having particular regard to the agreement governing the world heritage status of the Strait. Legacy storm water issues were another factor. Strong lobbying resulted in the proposal being overturned.
Two more concerted efforts were made in this decade by the PCPA to get the channel dredged with the last effort focussed on safety should there be a serious bushfire. Council and the State Government continued their stance that the area was environmentally sensitive and would not gain the necessary approvals from the environmental agencies.
In 2006, the Great Sandy Strait was declared a Marine Park.
In 2008, the MCC was amalgamated into a larger conglomerate, the Fraser Coast Regional Council (FCRC) with management moving to Hervey Bay and a community perceived view that there was less interest in the towns on Sandy Strait (refer to table of Poona's gains/losses).
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2016
General community displeasure remained as to be the 'poor cousins' when it came to infrastructure, including the sub-standard boat ramp. Colloquially, the ramp was referred to as the 'boat ramp to nowhere'.
Concerns were expressed as to the need to cater for both a growing and an ageing community (refer to population data). The depressed land values in Poona, in comparison to our neighbouring communities (>30% difference), was clearly a concern as is the case for most people, their home was their greatest asset. Many residents forced to relocate because of health issues were faced with significant financial shortfall in purchasing elsewhere. Refer to property data
Issues were identified and a stand out was a lack of infrastructure since the developer had gone and FCRC generally reducing services to the town (eg Blue waste transfer bins, removal of second toilet block, foreshore management, closure of green waste dump).
A dedicated Infrastructure Planning Sub Committee (IPSC) was established under the auspices of the PCPA.
MSQ had advised the IPSC of the engagement of GHD Consulting to undertake the latest Statewide assessment of boating infrastructure needs. The IPSC made a formal submission to that study and focussed on 3 important elements – economic, social and safety for an improved boating facility in Poona.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2017
Initiated by the IPSC, the community was asked to ‘have a say’ on what our town needed and all those inputs were collated into a database and presented without opinions/recommendations etc. to the first workshop.
That community workshop (22 April 2017, over 100 attendees) was held to discuss the ideas presented in the survey and identify the forward actions (10 Pillars). They were-
- Pathways & Walking Trails
- Beach Erosion - Mitigation
- Foreshore Infrastructure
- Boat Ramp Upgrade
- Official MSQ Navigational Markings
- Foreshore Enhancement
- Street Scaping
- Precinct Infrastructure
- Precinct Enhancement
- Community Services
- Development
- Tourism
- Retirement Village
- Council Services
For more information refer to the section on Community Workshops/Open Meetings
Collectively these Pillars focussed on the community’s identified needs as a growing and ageing community.
One of the 10 Pillars was an improved boating facility and seen as integral to a future plan.
Analysis of tide and wind data showed a ramp that had very limited access. In fact, studying the 2016 Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) data showed that the ramp was only usable for 48% of daylight hours and when wind was taken into account (direction & strength) that percentage was reduced to just 29%. Looking at it another way a fisher wanting to access the Strait on weekend mornings, over the entire 2016 calendar year that was only achievable on a ratio of 1 out of 9 weekends.
Initial enquiries with FCRC and MSQ suggested there was no way any dredging would be undertaken at the existing boat ramp because of environmental impacts and the situation was even greater now that the Strait was part of a Marine Park
MSQ released the GHD recommendations in May 2017 (Queensland Recreational Boating Facilities Demand Forecasting Study 2016) based on boat registrations, regional growth etc. identified Poona as a ‘Priority 1’ (as soon as possible) and with a recommendation of a new facility on Poona Creek. For more information refer to the section on Boating Demand Forecast Study 2017
The IPSC made subsequent written submissions to both FCRC and MSQ outlining Poona’s need.
FCRC held to a view that there was no value in a ramp on the creek as there was no difference to be gained in tide access, a position at on-site meetings debunked by local fisherman and evidence produced of a drone video taken on a spring low (dead low water). Watch the Video (38mb)
MSQ officers inspected the site on the creek and held a meeting with the PCPA outlining issues and the way forward.
The IPSC was invited to make a personal/formal presentation 29 May 2017 to a Councillor meeting detailing both the need for an improved boating facility and also the need for a new town plan covering the spectrum of the identified Pillars. There was clear support at that meeting from the Mayor and Councillors.
However, despite the support of the Councillors it was evident the FCRC bureaucracy resisted any commitment in advancing both the town plan and actions on the boat ramp. Eventually, FCRC and MSQ agreed to a joint Feasibility Study with the proposed boat ramp. MSQ was to evaluate all the water/ramp matters and FCRC the car parking and land tenure aspects to form the joint study outcome.
Concurrent with the boat ramp actions, the IPSC continued lobbying for an agreed town plan making many submissions and holding numerous meetings at all levels.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2018
Despite the agreed community position on the 10 Pillars and all the work that had already progressed, in April 2018 one resident emerged and strongly advocated that the proposed new boating facility should be on Poona Point, not on the creek.
There was no indication of any real support for the idea. The alternative was well and truly addressed and dismissed as an option on environmental and economic grounds. Marine Parks about this time released a ‘green paper’ regarding protection of rocky headlands on the Strait. Poona Point is one such rocky headland.
MSQ completed their hydrographic work and the raw data confirmed that the site on Poona Creek offered far greater access than the existing ramp or other possible foreshore sites.
MSQ advised also that as with the existing ramp any other foreshore location experienced the same obstacles (wind, dredging etc).
Preliminary geotechnical assessments undertaken and initial cultural assessments did not identify any matters of concern.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2019
Early in 2019 changes were proposed to the marine park and the Association, whilst encouraging individuals to make submissions expressing their views, the Association took a high level approach in a formal submission, focussed only on the community elements (eg erosion). The Marine Parks submission can be viewed/downloaded
With the progression of the boat ramp Feasibility Study, FCRC generally failed to meet stated deadlines as part of its commitment.
Similarly with the town planning FCRC resistance remained but agreement was finally reached to engage Archipelago Consulting, a well credentialed firm of town planners. On 25 October 2019 Archipelago led a terrific community workshop (over 100 attendees) but in the absence of the completed Feasibility Study a town plan could not be finalised.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2020
COVID emerged and impacted progression of all aspects associated with the Town Planning and the boat ramp.
Similarly, a level of disquiet on the Poona Creek proposal gained momentum and social media was used along with various letter box drops to discredit the plan of a boat ramp on Poona Creek
Disinformation was promulgated as to the unsuitability of the proposed site particularly citing the height of the cliff. The reality was that the site was on the gully adjacent to the cliff and was the former leasehold land upon which 'Tiger'
Thompson had a creek side hut until the 1990s.
A further community workshop was convened on 29 February 2020 (over 150 attending) following the release of the joint Feasibility Study. This was a combined Archipelago, MSQ, and FCRC presentation. For more information refer to the section on Community Workshops/Open Meetings
- At the workshop, boat ramp and carpark plans were displayed and demonstrated the whole project was suitable.
- The inaccurate facts around inclines were debunked (ramp steepness 1:8 (the standard incline for boat ramps), a turnaround area relatively flat at just 1:20 and an incline to the carpark 1:10). Overall, nothing unusual.
- Good suggestions were put forward at the workshop having regard to the median age of Poona residents. FCRC set a formal consultation period with final submissions due by 31 March 2020.
- Clearly when the majority of the town are in favour with what is proposed they do not bother to make written submissions but the results (31 submissions) were strongly in support (80%). Of the negative submissions, one sought a construction on Poona Point and the others cited it being too difficult a site on the creek and/or opposed on environmental grounds.
- The final Feasibilty Study included an added section rejecting any prospect of a ramp on Poona Point. See Appendix 'J' of the Feasibility Study
- With modified plans to include floating walkway etc. the total project cost was estimated (with contingencies) at $4.13m.
- FCRC at its Council meeting on 23 June 2020 voted unanimously, giving ‘in principle’ support for a new facility on Poona Creek and requested that the feasibility report and preferred conceptual design layouts be used as the basis of a joint pre-lodgement meeting with relevant State Agencies.
At the same workshop, a comprehensive town plan was presented by Archipelago and well received seeking to have infrastructure improvements with the underlying approach to maintain Poona’s natural appearance (minimal concrete/bitumen). Following this presentation of a draft plan to the community, FCRC at its meeting on 25 November 2020, formally adopted the Plan as a component of its town planning suite of documents.
With the Poona Creek boat ramp signed off by Council in June, FCRC executives at a meeting 29 October 2020 advised that land tenure was a key topic in light of the relevant parcel of land for the boat ramp car park having recently been handed back to the Butchulla people.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2021
On 5 February 2021, a meeting regarding boat ramp progress was convened at our MLA’s office and attendees included FCRC representatives. The FCRC representatives emphasised that there needed to be consultation with changes to an Environmental Reserve and there is also the consideration of Butchulla interests. The tenure aspect needed to be dealt with first even though it was an aspect that should have been done as a consideration in the Feasibility Study. Other advice conveyed to the IPSC was that a FCRC meeting with State Agencies indications were that ‘there did not appear to be the number of red flags previously thought’.
No further meetings were held during 2021 and there were some COVID issues but we were led to believe matters were progressing with land tenure issues.
FCRC wins a prestigious statewide award for community engagement associated with the development of the Poona Town Plan and boat ramp consultation.
A small group emerged in opposition to the Poona Creek boat ramp proposal and ignoring the community's democratically determined decisions took up a petition over the Christmas break canvassing locals and visitors to have the existing Owen Cox St ramp upgraded. History repeating itself and giving government agencies opportunities for an 'out', as had happened also in other towns.
To allay many of the concerns an open community meeting was held on 11 December 2021. For more information refer to the section on Community Workshops/Open Meetings
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2022
With all that had happened to get a better boating facility, the Feasibility Study completed and essentially a ‘shovel ready’ project for Poona at a cost of $4.13m, it became evident that FCRC failed in its undertaking to negotiate with the Butchulla traditional owners.
A highly regarded Butchulla Elder wrote on 22 February 2022 to FCRC and the State Member advisingÂ
- that the Butchulla people were being blamed for delays in getting a boating facility citing that there had not been any contact with the Butchulla people on the matter
- the comments also included advice that the proposed site had pipe clay and was culturally significant (in his view). It was not a formal stance of the Butchulla Native Title Aboriginal Corporation (BNTAC) but nonetheless an issue of importance
Instead of taking the matter further through due levels of consultation/negotiation FCRC, in these most dubious of circumstances simply seized on the reference of ‘cultural significance’ and totally withdrew from the project, accordingly advising MSQ of their decision.
While not dismissing the comment around cultural significance, it is of note that the land at the proposed ramp site, under Native Title is ‘non-exclusive use area’. In contrast the area at the existing Owen Cox St ramp is ‘exclusive use area’ and that status extends the full length of the Poona foreshore.
The big question to be answered - what information/facts about the Poona community's desires/requests had been conveyed to the Butchulla Elder to form such a view, and by whom?
Also in 2022, Marine Parks called for submissions on proposed changes to the Great Sandy Marine Park. There were a number of contentious issues affecting all the local coastal communities including-
- the expansion of ‘go slow’ areas
- closure of crabbing in local creeks
- impact of changes to speed within those ‘go slow’ areas
- unmarked transit lanes, and
- the significant increase in the level of fines associated with breaches eg. ‘go slow’ zones
With the proposals, the community was encouraged to make individual submissions. Aware of the contentious nature of many of the proposals and affecting all the coastal communities the Association asked for direct community engagement before any proposals were adopted. Consultation Request
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2023
The adopted Poona Town Plan is a 10-year plan but implementation appears to be moving at glacial pace. Essentially nothing has progressed since FCRC sign off in November 2020.
Beach erosion remains a serious concern for many and still no action or even the establishment of a consultative group and/or expert engagement.
FCRC's advice in acknowledging delays has cited budget constraints. Whilst the 2023/24 budget has not yet been released, this position contrasts with the past budget years where both operating revenue and expenditure increased each year in the order of 6-8%. Then couple it with Poona volunteers, unlike many other communities on the Fraser Coast, do a lot of work with FCRC workers eg. the Parks & Gardens Group that work to keep out town looking at its best (eg maintaining Market Alley and cul-de-sac gardens, public toilet rectification works). All that assistance saves FCRC financially or maybe the work just wouldn't otherwise get done.
With the Poona Creek boat ramp proposal shut down and with no other viable options available in Poona, MSQ undertook to explore further what could be achieved at the Owen Cox St ramp, particularly some form of shallow dredging. A second Feasibility Study was undertaken that involved-
- a hydrographic survey
- preliminary agency approvals, and
- geotechnical sampling
Those steps were completed in February 2023 and the outcome of the Feasibility Study is expected within a few months. If dredging is permitted, the way forward remains unclear as many other elements come into play including-
- FCRC's non-commitment (at this stage) regarding car parking in the vicinity of the upgraded ramp
- the car parking interplay with the existing town plan which had Owen Cox St to be a shared zone and in general, the area to remain in a natural state
- the foreshore at the Owen Cox St is an 'Exclusive Use Area' under the Native Title Act 1993 and will require FCRC/MSQ negotiating with the Butchulla traditional owners
- Native Title (Claim #2) extends to the waters which will likely require negotiation before dredging.
Given the above, the timeframe is likely to be quite protracted. In addition, while we may at some point in the future achieve better tidal access, we will though still have a ramp severely exposed to wind (facing prevailing southeast winds without any form of protection).
The latest Recreational Boating Facilities Demand Forecasting Study 2022 was released in May 2023 with Poona relegated to a 'Priority 3' and focussed on the existing Owen Cox st ramp but equally put greater emphasis on usage of the Tuan boat ramp. Whilst it is only a distance by road of 16 klms, more importantly it exposes drivers to the dangers of the Cooloola Coast Rd in the travels. The Fraser Coast section of the report can be viewed/downloaded
The IPSC continues negotiation and remains committed to achieve the 2017 community's goal of improved boating access to the Strait.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
2024
In the previous year commitments were made to undertake a review of the 'no dredging policy' of the Owen Cox St boat ramp. That study was completed in February 2023 and finally a concept plan was provided to the PCPA on 13 April 2024.
The plan proposes a dual boat ramp, fixed walkway and shallow dredging extending to the Poona Ck channel. The dredging spoil is to be used for foreshore renourishment in the area adjacent to the boat ramp. Note this is a concept plan and is yet to be subject of detailed engineering plans/specifications and so too other aspects around Native Title etc.. The Concept Plan can be viewed/downloaded.
On 8 June 2024 (PCPA General Meeting) the State Member (Bruce Saunders) reaffirmed that the existing boat ramp will be converted to a dual ramp with shallow dredging to facilitate greater access to the Strait. Bruce Saunders will be presenting further details at the PCPA July General Meeting.
As we enter the 2024/25 financial year, the official MSQ website detailing Boating Facilities (current and proposed projects) shows the below information that has remained unchanged since early 2023.
Ironically, upgrading the existing boat ramp was all the community sought dating right back to the mid 1990s, during the period of the Peter Kurts development and likewise, the documented outcomes of the community engagement in 2018. However, over all these decades, anything on Owen Cox St was consistently ruled out of scope by all the government agencies, because of acid soils. In more recent times it was decreed as unsuitable, facing prevailing winds (safety) and of course, resulted in the engineered plans for the Poona Creek site. A plan subsequently gazumped by FCRC.
As this concept progresses, we need to be mindful of associated matters like trailer parking and intergration with the FCRC Endorsed Poona Town Plan.
We live in hope that it doesn't continue at the past, glacial pace.
Marine Park changes to be implemented
On 11 May 2024 the State Member, Bruce Saunders provided the Community General Meeting with a summary sheet detailing Marine Park changes to come into effect from 21 May 2024.
This stemmed from the Qld Government's 'Green Paper' in September 2022. Appreciating the scope of change and noting there had not been local community consultation, commensurate with the complexity and significance of the proposed changes, the PCPA along with the other coastal towns,
requested that the Department hold workshops in the Sandy Strait communities. It was proposed that the workshops be attended by the experts who can explain in detail the proposed changes and benefits of those changes. Stated support for that action was received from the State Member but no response from the Department or subsequently, any form of community workshops.
Next response - changes, essentially as proposed in 2022, now being implemented.
Clearly, these changes have broad implications for all fishermen and so too, those simply venturing out on the waters of the Great Sandy Strait. Of particular note is the speed in 'Go Slow' zones which has been reduced to 'less than 6 knots'. Certainly won't be a popular decision in the local areas of Poona, Boonooroo and Tinnanbar. Then there are the 'Seasonal Shorebird closure areas' and one would imagine that will impact the Poona area as well.
Please review the
The handout ' Information Sheet', and
Marine Parks website
for further information.
Return to Timeline Beginning Return to previous section Return to Top |
In the absence of comparable public infrastructure/government services to that in other coastal communities, Poona's property values will be less than they should be. Hence, every landowner in Poona has a financial stake in appropriate, community approved development.
Return to Timeline Return to Top |
|